Many people notice that weight loss with GLP-1 medications can look different for women than for men. Some women report slower week-to-week scale changes, more frequent “stalls,” or fluctuations that seem to line up with menstrual cycle phases or the perimenopause transition.
These patterns are not necessarily a sign that treatment is failing—or that someone is doing something “wrong.” Sex hormones such as estrogen and progesterone influence appetite signaling, insulin sensitivity, fluid balance, energy expenditure, and fat distribution. When these hormones fluctuate, scale weight can temporarily behave in ways that don’t reflect true fat-loss progress, even when broader metabolic health is improving.
This article explains why plateaus may appear more often in women, how menstrual-cycle and menopause transitions can affect interpretation of results, and what discussion points may help patients and providers individualize a sustainable approach.
On average, men and women begin GLP-1 therapy with different baseline physiological characteristics that can influence how weight loss appears over time.
Men often have higher baseline lean muscle mass, which contributes to a higher resting energy expenditure. Muscle tissue burns more calories at rest than fat tissue, which can make early weight loss appear faster. Men also tend to store a greater proportion of fat viscerally, particularly around the abdomen. Visceral fat is often more metabolically active and may respond more quickly to early caloric and hormonal shifts. In addition, men do not experience cyclical hormonal changes, which means fewer predictable fluctuations in water retention that can obscure scale trends.
Women, by contrast, typically carry higher essential body fat and are more likely to store fat subcutaneously, particularly in the hips and thighs. Subcutaneous fat often changes more gradually, even when metabolic health is improving. Women also experience regular hormonal fluctuations that can influence appetite, cravings, sleep quality, perceived energy, and fluid balance. These factors can affect both eating patterns and scale readings. Over time, many women also experience metabolic changes during perimenopause and menopause, including shifts in insulin sensitivity and body composition.
These are broad population trends rather than rigid rules. Individual responses vary widely, and many women still experience significant and meaningful results with GLP-1 therapy.
Estrogen plays multiple roles in metabolic regulation. In simplified terms, estrogen is associated with:
When estrogen levels shift (across the cycle or during the menopause transition), some individuals experience:
This does not mean progress is impossible—it means progress may look less linear on the scale.
Progesterone rises in the luteal phase (roughly the 1–2 weeks before menstruation). During this phase, many women experience some combination of:
A key point: water retention can mask fat loss. Someone can be losing fat while the scale holds steady—or even rises—temporarily. For many, scale weight drops again after hormone levels shift at the start of menstruation, sometimes creating a “whoosh” effect.
Perimenopause often involves fluctuating estrogen and progesterone, and menopause typically involves sustained lower estrogen levels. During these transitions, many women report changes such as:
GLP-1 medications can still be effective in this life stage, but the slope of progress may look different. In practice, many clinicians emphasize:
Some women find it useful to interpret progress through a monthly lens rather than week-to-week.
Common pattern (not universal):
If someone weighs only once per week, it’s easy to accidentally weigh during a “high-water” phase repeatedly and conclude the medication is not working when fat loss is still occurring.
“Plateau” is often a mix of several overlapping factors:
Importantly, plateaus are common in all bodies. Women may simply see more “noise” in the data due to cyclical physiology.
GLP-1 medications primarily act through incretin pathways that affect appetite regulation, gastric emptying, and glucose metabolism. While these mechanisms are not “hormone therapy,” they can interact with hormone-driven patterns by:
However, GLP-1 therapy does not override every driver of hunger, sleep disruption, or water retention. For some women, the most meaningful outcome isn’t perfectly linear weight loss—it’s improved appetite control, fewer cravings, better metabolic labs, and gradual body composition change.
These are not personal medical instructions—just common, provider-guided discussion topics that may support adherence and interpretation:
Scale weight is influenced by:
For many women, the more reliable signals of progress include:
Women can achieve significant weight reduction and metabolic improvements with GLP-1 therapy, but the path may be less linear—especially with cyclical hormone changes or menopause transitions. Over months, many people see:
The most sustainable outcomes typically come from a plan that accounts for real-world variability rather than fighting it.
Why does the scale rise before my period even if I’m on a GLP-1?
Many women retain water during the luteal phase; this can temporarily mask fat loss.
Is it normal to “stall” for two weeks and then drop quickly?
It can happen, particularly when cyclical fluid retention resolves and the scale catches up.
Do GLP-1s work in menopause?
They can be effective, but expectations may need to account for body composition, sleep, and insulin sensitivity changes that can occur after estrogen declines.
Should I weigh daily or weekly?
Some people prefer daily weights to see trendlines; others do better with less frequent tracking. The key is interpreting patterns over time, not single readings.
Carr, M. C. (2003). The emergence of the metabolic syndrome with menopause. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 88(6), 2404–2411. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-030242
Daka, B., Rosen, T., Jansson, P. A., Råstam, L., Larsson, C. A., & Lindblad, U. (2015). Inverse association between serum insulin and sex hormone-binding globulin in a population survey in Sweden. Endocrine Connections, 4(3), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-15-0017
Jastreboff, A. M., Aronne, L. J., Ahmad, N. N., et al. (2022). Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. The New England Journal of Medicine, 387(3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2206038
Lovejoy, J. C., Champagne, C. M., de Jonge, L., Xie, H., & Smith, S. R. (2008). Increased visceral fat and decreased energy expenditure during the menopausal transition. International Journal of Obesity, 32(6), 949–958. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.25
Marlatt, K. L., Pitynski-Miller, D. R., Gavin, K. M., et al. (2022). Body composition and cardiometabolic health across the menopause transition. Obesity, 30(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23289
Wilding, J. P. H., Batterham, R. L., Calanna, S., et al. (2021). Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. The New England Journal of Medicine, 384(11), 989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2032183
Zore, T., Palafox, M., & Reue, K. (2018). Sex differences in obesity, lipid metabolism, and inflammation—A role for the sex chromosomes? Molecular Metabolism, 15, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2018.04.003